Topic awaiting preservation: Nurture over Nature (Page 1 of 1) |
|
---|---|
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: 100101010011 <-- right about here |
posted 01-22-2003 02:37
Here's an interesting article regarding a cat and it's clone. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: New California |
posted 01-22-2003 04:11
I weigh in heavily towards the nurture side of that long standing debate. Personally, I am amazed at how people think they can actually get back the same pet (and eventually human) from cloning. Is the desire to regain what was lost so overwhelming that it overrides common sense that would dictate clones can't duplicate life experience? |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Dallas, TX |
posted 01-22-2003 06:18
there are so many variables at work in the gestational process of any complex animal that scientists would have to figure a way to begin with exact dna replication much farther along in the gestational period than at the zygote (or wherever the hell they start these days). |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: under the bed |
posted 01-22-2003 18:31
For starters, Yes - what ^ he said. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: New California |
posted 01-22-2003 18:45
Agreed on that last statement, but I think the debate has always really been about the *ratio* of nurture and nature. As we learn more we should be able to narrow down the location of that line but we'll probably never be able to nail it down. |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: under the bed |
posted 01-22-2003 20:34 |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Dallas, TX |
posted 01-23-2003 00:25
nah. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: New California |
posted 01-23-2003 00:46
I've always liked 80/20 |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: From:From: |
posted 01-23-2003 12:23
It was a good try, nontheless. |