Topic awaiting preservation: Regime Change in America (Page 1 of 1)

quote:

---

The idea that a pre-emptive strike could save the world a heap of trouble isn't entirely idle. Think, if Genghis Khan could have been taken out when he was still the leader of just a band and not the whole Mongol race, Europe and Asia would have been saved several million dead and the destruction of much of its civilisation. Remove Napoleon from the scene on his return from his ill-fated Egyptian foray and Europe would have been a different place.

The last century doesn't provide such good examples, of course. To have "changed regime" in Berlin in the early Thirties would have meant overturning a democratically elected leader in Hitler. As for the efforts by the allies to stop the course of the Russian revolution with troops after 1918, the results were disastrous despite having well-armed local allies.

Its opponents are locked up without trial or the right to habeas corpus.

Nonetheless, George Bush did something in early August to set out the parameters to pre-emptive action. "We owe it," he said in Maine on August 3, "to the future of civilisation not to allow the world's worst leaders to develop and deploy and therefore blackmail free countries with the world's worst weapons." And he went on to define such enemies of the people as regimes intent on building up weapons of mass destruction, oblivious of international law and UN resolutions, governments who imprisoned their opponents without trial and who could not claim democratic legitimacy at home.

Significantly, nowhere in the series of speeches he made this week did Bush actually name these rogue regimes. But it is pretty clear reading the descriptions whom he must have meant. The government which is spending by far the most on weapons of mass destruction, and is now planning to raise its budget by an increase greater than the total defense spending of Europe, is, of course, based in Washington. Not only is it building an arsenal the like of which the world has never seen, it has unilaterally withdrawn from the treaties designed to limit the spread of nuclear weapons, and has refused to accept any kind of international monitoring of its chemical or nuclear weapons facilities.

It has a government in power without the legitimacy of a democratic majority, in the hands of a coterie from a single part of the country and clearly aiming at a dynasty of rule. Its rhetoric is one of violent aggression against anyone seen as its enemies. Its opponents are locked up without trial or the right to habeas corpus.

Of course there are those who say the country's threats are greatly exaggerated and the rhetoric of world mastery must not be confused with a real intention of using its weaponry in defiance of international law. True, it has a history of interfering with and invading its neighbours -- Panama, Grenada, Haiti et al. But since the long and debilitating war in Vietnam, it has kept largely to its own region.

Of course it has a peculiarly obnoxious regime, ready to poison its own people with corrupt capitalism and deregulated pollution. But give it time, and pressure from the outside world, and it will pay up its U.N. dues, rejoin the nuclear proliferation pacts and the Kyoto treaty and start behaving as a responsible member of the community again.

Washington has showed itself determined to enforce its hegemony.


Against this, the hard men of the right would say that time is exactly what the world does not have on its side. Washington has showed itself determined to enforce its hegemony, come what may. It has shown itself ready to use weapons of aerial bombardment that make no discrimination between combatants and civilians, to show precious little remorse when it is guilty of "mistakes."

It is no friend of democracy, having announced its refusal to deal with the only two elected leaders of the Islamic world -- Khatami in Iran and Yasser Arafat in Palestine, the latter the only Arab leader ever elected with western observers checking the process. The country has armed and succoured state terrorism and assassination by the Israelis. It has installed the worst sort of warlord gangsters in Afghanistan and, according to "intelligence," been party to upsetting (albeit briefly) the elected president of Venezuela. The world cannot afford to await its next move.

The world cannot afford to await its next move.

Given time, this rogue superstate might then be able to take its place once again among the family of peace-loving nations.

---

www.muhajabah.com/islamicblog/archives/the_clipboard/004835.php

...xpi...

[This message has been edited by Xpirex (edited 04-23-2003).]

Goddamnit I just changed my regimes, my only clean pair are in the wash...

:::krets.net:::

.


...xpi...

"nuff said"

quote:

---

Illuminati - Another part of this letter was discovered in 1949, which graphically outlined plans for three world wars and at least two revolutions. The first world war was to enable communistic atheism to destroy the czarist government in Russia. This was accomplished. The second world war was to begin by pitting Great Britain against Germany, in order to destroy Naziism, and advance the cause of Zionism, so that Israel could become a nation. This was accomplished. After this war, Communism was to be made strong enough to begin taking over weaker governments. In 1945, at the Potsdam Conference between Truman, Churchill, and Stalin, Russia was given a chunk of Europe, and that helped to sweep the tide of Communism into China. The plan also called for a third world war, which is to be ignited by firing up the aggression between the Zionists(Israel) and the Arab world, who will destroy each other, bringing the rest of the world into a final conflict. This conflict will be engineered to produce complete social, political, and economic chaos; out of which will emerge an Illuminati-controlled world government.

---

Hummm....


-->Ozone Quotes<--

[This message has been edited by Gilbert Nolander (edited 04-23-2003).]

Aah...yes and they are on an unstopable course...but your forgetting something.... Armagedon, and the outcome does not rest in the hands of mankind

...xpi...

"nuff said"

GN: There must be something in it as they sneaky Illuminati have editted your link so we can't visit the site - very cunning.

___________________
Emps

FAQs: Emperor

Xpirex, I know you said you don't have space to tell us about the source of these prophecies you keep referring to, but couldn't you give us a link or two to at least get an idea?

Oh Bugs..(spelling corrected, thanx WS) you don't let me get away with anything do you?... I like that.

The prophecy stuff I think should have it's own thread so I will gather all my data and when this thread is spent I will indulge you to the max. That should give me plenty of time. Hope you are well and having a wonderful day in the meantime.

...xpi...

"nuff said"

[This message has been edited by Xpirex (edited 04-23-2003).]

Yea, that's strange. Well, here is another link about similiar stuff, but I couldn't seem to be able to find that original one.
http://www.viewfromthewall.com/13leadership.htm

Oh wait, here it is, its www.gov***.com/NWO1.htm - the three *** are the word s u x. I guess the Asylum blocks out that word.


-->Ozone Quotes<--

[This message has been edited by Gilbert Nolander (edited 04-23-2003).]

Xpirex, his name is Bugs...

And as for Regime change in America, that happens every 4~8 years

I think it is referred to as voting...and the term limits for the President.

[This message has been edited by WebShaman (edited 04-23-2003).]