Preserved Topic: Mr. Max ... please read... =) |
|
---|---|
Author | Thread |
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: purgatory |
posted 04-07-2001 23:57
In your opinion, how does your html editor compaire with HomeSite and why? |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Lower City, Iest, Lower Felda |
posted 04-08-2001 03:23
Why don't you d/l it yourself and find out, since its you that is going to be using it, not Mr.Max(even if he did write it). |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: under the bed |
posted 04-08-2001 03:34
yeah, why don't you, huh? huh? |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: Belgrade, Serbia |
posted 04-08-2001 13:08
Acidbox, IMO you can't compare HTML Beauty with HomeSite for one simple reason and that is because HTML Beauty is completely free while HomeSite isn't. So, in that field HTML Beauty always wins! As far as features are concerned, I would like to point out that HTML Beauty has auto-updating code snippets (you can add a bunch of HTML code by a touch of a button and you can also update it later with a touch of a button), very good Find & Replace (normal and extended versions - extended has support for PERL compatbile regular expressions and can perform search in a bunch of files with detailed report), smart right-click tag editing, "Tag Designers" for almost all HTML tags, very sophisticated "Beauty Scripts" and much much more. Oh, I almost forgot to mention that HTML Beauty is the first HTML editor in the world with support for WBMP image files (used by WAP mobile phones). Anyway, for a complete list of features take a look at the HTML Beauty's web site... |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: A graveyard of dreams |
posted 04-08-2001 21:37
I tried HomeSite once , but after that first time I never used it. MAX's HTML Beauty++ is *much* better, IMHO! I've also tried alot of other editors (for example 1st Page 2000) but MAX's HTML Beauty++ is still THE BEST for me... |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: north hills, ca usa |
posted 04-09-2001 19:07
I'm hangin' with MAX's HTML Beauty, too... |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: Belgrade, Serbia |
posted 04-10-2001 07:47 |