Preserved Topic: Most wanted video in Internet history (Page 1 of 1)

I've read that lately the most searched video in the search engines is the one where ... Janet Jackson tries to get a little of attention from some millions of people.

Here it is: http://tv.terra.com.br/jornaldoterra/interna/0,,OI37469-EI1039,00.html

Once this page is loaded, click the button "Assista Agora", which means Watch Now.

I hadn't seen it yet, and it's just ridiculous.


EDIT: an adjective was deleted...

[This message has been edited by viol (edited 02-08-2004).]

It was also the most watched freezeframe/backup on WebTv that night.
Can't see why, she's got to pin those sisters up on a clothes line!
She filled out the flab better when she was fat!

If I am not mistaken "La putana" means "The Whore".

If that is so;
a) What is the source of your assertion that Ms Jackson sells her favours.
b) How much?


---
"The future is not written in stone.
It is written day by day,
What are you writing today?"
http://wulfius-khan.deviantart.com/
http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/wulfius/

I don't beleive it's viol's assertation at all, but rather it is what the media/public in Brazil happen to be calling her.

The reason I called her that is because the adjective that I used (and that I decided to delete) is not only meant to someone that sells her body, but also to someone that has no moral, and what she did was absolutely immoral.

Anyway, WK has a point, so I deleted my badly chosen adjective.

[This message has been edited by viol (edited 02-08-2004).]

is it really necessary to start another thread about the tit shot?

Now that you mentioned, and I spent a little time looking back, I'm pretty sure the answer is NO, it is not.

This thread was not necessary but now that it's here and it wasn't locked, yet, let me tell you that I was reading this news, http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/internet/02/06/jackson.web.reut/index.html , and I thought: people, in general, are stupidly curious. Looking to past threads, to see if this one that I had opened was useless - as in fact it proved to be - I found the link to good quality photos about the J.J. event. And so I found out that besides J.J. event, there were another event in that Super Bowl game: a man, running naked, with an ad painted in his chest, about an online address.
I read the address, blahblah.com, and I thought: what this man did is stupid. Why should my curiosity drive me to take a look at this address, to find out what it is about? If I visit the site that this man is advertising, I'm just playing his game, I'm just playing the game the company that paid this guy wants me to play. So, I didn't visit.
But unfortunately, human being curiosity is too strong. Most people can't understand that when they visit a site that has used such sort of advertising, they are just telling that it's worth using such kind of advertising.
It's the same with attachments inside messages that we have no idea who sent us. People don't care about safety, if there is an attachment, let's open it, let know what it is about, and then thousands of computers are infected with virus.
The same happens in road accidents. The transit gets very bad many cases not because of the accident in itself, but because people is too curious: when they are driving near the accident, they slow down much more that what's necessary, because they want to keep looking at the scene of the accident.
It's the curiosity that killed the cat, as we say in my country.

EDIT: and the same curiosity of Men is responsible for spamming. If no one ever opened the spam they receive, there would be no spam at all.

[This message has been edited by viol (edited 02-08-2004).]

quote:

---

what she did was absolutely immoral.

---

Ahhh, the 'Puritans' live. What she 'did' is not that big of a deal. She showed a tit. BFD.

She didnt hurt anyone, except for those hypocrites who would have us believe they were irrevocably scarred by the 3 second flash of mam...

How silly.

______________
Is This Thing On?

Bleah...

That's not puritanism of my part.
Show a tit, is no big deal depending on the context.
In that context, the way she did, is the most stupid thing ever. Besides stupidity, I can see opportunism, betrayal, misbehavior, shame and a lot of other bad features in her act that would make me spend more time that I want to look for the correct English words in the dictionary.
I just can't see any good in it.
She raised the pattern of atrocities in television to a level never reached before.
Now, CBS, ABC, NBC, all the big TVs are going to implement delays.
So, I don't think it was no big fuc*ing deal.
I don't think I'm alone in this judgement.
And even if I were, I'd keep my reasoning.

The poster has demanded we remove all his contributions, less he takes legal action.
We have done so.
Now Tyberius Prime expects him to start complaining that we removed his 'free speech' since this message will replace all of his posts, past and future.
Don't follow his example - seek real life help first.

i think that Kid Rock's (the other tit) blatant disregard for the American Flag should have gotten far more attention than Ms. Jacko's stunt...