![]() Preserved Topic: Regular Expressions (Page 1 of 1)  | 
  |
|---|---|
| 
       Maniac (V) Inmate From: Boston, MA, USA  | 
    
       
  posted 09-14-2000 20:09
      
      (I posted this on the Gurus board to, so apologies to those who read both)  | 
  
| 
       Lunatic (VI) Mad Scientist From: Massachusetts, USA  | 
    
       
  posted 09-14-2000 21:14
      
      Well, my JavaScript book covers them, but I'm no expert so I'll wait for a Perl guru to come along first...  | 
  
| 
       Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: 100101010011 <-- right about here  | 
    
       
  posted 09-14-2000 21:15
      
      Okay I am not a big fan of regular expressions (My bad but I need to learn more)  | 
  
| 
       Maniac (V) Inmate From: Boston, MA, USA  | 
    
       
  posted 09-14-2000 21:25
      
      Thanks. It didn't HAVE to be a RegEx, just couldn't think of any other way. This looks cleaner and simpler. RegEx is so tough for me to wrap my brain around, but when I get one to work it is so fast and powerful I jump up and down.  | 
  
| 
       Maniac (V) Inmate From: Boston, MA, USA  | 
    
       
  posted 09-14-2000 21:42
      
      Fooey.  | 
  
| 
       Maniac (V) Inmate From: Houston(ish) Texas  | 
    
       
  posted 09-14-2000 22:01
      
      The regular expression:  | 
  
| 
       Maniac (V) Inmate From: Boston, MA, USA  | 
    
       
  posted 09-14-2000 22:26
      
      Das - your eyes caught it. Sheesh. Copy and paste is a wonderful thing, but it helps to actually look at it too.  | 
  
| 
       Maniac (V) Inmate From: Houston(ish) Texas  | 
    
       
  posted 09-14-2000 23:13
      
      I'm a C++ programmer by trade; I'm very skilled at finding little bitty punctuation errors  <img border=0 align=absmiddle src="http://www.ozones.com/forum/smile.gif">  | 
  
| 
       Lunatic (VI) Mad Scientist From: Massachusetts, USA  | 
    
       
  posted 09-15-2000 00:02
      
      Ah, glad you got it.  | 
  
| 
       Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: 100101010011 <-- right about here  | 
    
       
  posted 09-15-2000 02:18
      
      Actually Slime is right I think you do want to use the !=-1 or actually just < 0  | 
  
| 
       Lunatic (VI) Mad Scientist From: Massachusetts, USA  | 
    
       
  posted 09-15-2000 03:32
      
      Well, don't use "< 0" because that will return true if it *isn't* there.  Either "!= -1" or ">= 0" will work.  | 
  
| 
       Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: 100101010011 <-- right about here  | 
    
       
  posted 09-15-2000 04:18
      
      yeah  | 
  
| 
       Lunatic (VI) Mad Scientist From: Massachusetts, USA  | 
    
       
  posted 09-15-2000 04:19
      
      =D  | 
  
| 
       Maniac (V) Inmate From: Boston, MA, USA  | 
    
       
  posted 09-15-2000 21:56
      
      They both worked for me. I switched to the !=-1 since Slime said it's more commonly seen and who wants to be uncommon, but for the record both approaches worked well.  |