Preserved Topic: who requested me? |
|
---|---|
Author | Thread |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Lebanon |
posted 07-06-2002 11:00
Hello, |
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: Amsterdam |
posted 07-06-2002 18:42
What exactly do you mean by requesting? <img src="a.php"> or something like that? |
Lunatic (VI) Mad Scientist From: Massachusetts, USA |
posted 07-06-2002 23:05
document.referrer |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Lebanon |
posted 07-15-2002 08:27
no Slime more than that.... code: <body>
|
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: Belgrade, Serbia |
posted 07-15-2002 10:34 |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Lebanon |
posted 07-15-2002 12:00
yes and no.... |
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: Amsterdam |
posted 07-15-2002 13:32
That's right, the HTTP_REFERER is officially non-100% proof. Nice, huh? |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Lebanon |
posted 07-15-2002 14:23
Nevel, the one problem is that i cannot add that js code along with the <img> tag , nice attempt though. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: Belgrade, Serbia |
posted 07-15-2002 15:23
Lallous, I just did a quick test and Netscape Navigator 4.79 did send referrer variable to the test script, which was called from a different domain via <IMG> tag. Maybe something is wrong with your NN4? AFAIK, web browsers should always send referrer variable (unless web site visitor uses firewall that block referrer variable), no matter whether web site visitor followed a link or visited a page that includes files from other domains... |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Lebanon |
posted 07-15-2002 16:10
mr.Max : today i'm not focusing well! quote:
|
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: Amsterdam |
posted 07-15-2002 16:19
Hmz, I'm glad it works, but *somewhere* on php.net(can't #%$#% find it) it says that HTTP_REFERER isn't foul-proof... |
Lunatic (VI) Mad Scientist From: Massachusetts, USA |
posted 07-15-2002 17:43
It's not. Browsers aren't *required* to send the referer, but most do. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: Belgrade, Serbia |
posted 07-15-2002 19:30 |