![]() Preserved Topic: who requested me? (Page 1 of 1) |
|
---|---|
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Lebanon |
![]() Hello, |
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: Amsterdam |
![]() What exactly do you mean by requesting? <img src="a.php"> or something like that? |
Lunatic (VI) Mad Scientist From: Massachusetts, USA |
![]() document.referrer |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Lebanon |
![]() no Slime more than that.... code: <body>
|
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: Belgrade, Serbia |
![]() |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Lebanon |
![]() yes and no.... |
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: Amsterdam |
![]() That's right, the HTTP_REFERER is officially non-100% proof. Nice, huh? |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Lebanon |
![]() Nevel, the one problem is that i cannot add that js code along with the <img> tag , nice attempt though. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: Belgrade, Serbia |
![]() Lallous, I just did a quick test and Netscape Navigator 4.79 did send referrer variable to the test script, which was called from a different domain via <IMG> tag. Maybe something is wrong with your NN4? AFAIK, web browsers should always send referrer variable (unless web site visitor uses firewall that block referrer variable), no matter whether web site visitor followed a link or visited a page that includes files from other domains... |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Lebanon |
![]() mr.Max : today i'm not focusing well! quote:
|
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: Amsterdam |
![]() Hmz, I'm glad it works, but *somewhere* on php.net(can't #%$#% find it) it says that HTTP_REFERER isn't foul-proof... |
Lunatic (VI) Mad Scientist From: Massachusetts, USA |
![]() It's not. Browsers aren't *required* to send the referer, but most do. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: Belgrade, Serbia |
![]() |