Preserved Topic: Watermarc |
|
---|---|
Author | Thread |
Obsessive-Compulsive (I) Inmate From: Berlin |
posted 03-26-2000 19:18
Hi folks<P>I updated to photoshop 5.5 recently. One thing that really |
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: Midlothian, VA USA |
posted 03-28-2000 23:09
The answer to your question is probably "no". The watermark is one of the only ways to really protect an artists work online. Apparently they can last through many recompressions of an image. IMHO this is a good thing. Think about it - wouldn't you want to protect your images in whatever way possible to keep people from making money on your work?<P>------------------ |
Maniac (V) Lord Mad Scientist Sovereign of all the lands Ozone and just beyond that little green line over there... From: Stockholm, Sweden |
posted 03-29-2000 19:54
Although to be honest, Photoshop is *really* bad about detecting these things! Try it, I have. Take an image, maybe 300 pix x 150 pix and watermark it. Then chop a piece off of either end and make it a bit smaller. Watermark gone, usually. Disspointing.<P>-doc- |
Obsessive-Compulsive (I) Inmate From: Berlin |
posted 03-30-2000 16:38
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by eedn: |