Preserved Topic: Debian or what?? |
|
---|---|
Author | Thread |
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist From: Somewhere over the rainbow |
posted 09-23-2002 12:21
The poster has demanded we remove all his contributions, less he takes legal action. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: 127 Halcyon Road, Marenia, Atlantis |
posted 09-23-2002 13:11
Personally, I'm a FreeBSD monkey uunless I'm trying to make a sever... then I'm a Slackware monkey... |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: Belgrade, Serbia |
posted 09-23-2002 14:50 |
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist From: Somewhere over the rainbow |
posted 09-23-2002 17:11
The poster has demanded we remove all his contributions, less he takes legal action. |
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist From: Omicron Persei 8 |
posted 09-23-2002 17:49
yes. freeBSD all the way. very popular for servers these days. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: 100101010011 <-- right about here |
posted 09-23-2002 17:50
Yeah my understanding (not personal experience) is that the FreeBSD builds are better for servers,. generally more secure out of the box and better networking. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: 127 Halcyon Road, Marenia, Atlantis |
posted 09-23-2002 18:03
yeah... kde.... |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: Rochester, New York, USA |
posted 09-24-2002 03:35
I would also hop on the FreeBSD bandwagon. I have been using it for a good amount of time as my primary desktop enviornment. I have had some issues. Such as needing to know that I must install a wrapper in order to run X-windows as a user. Once I figured that one out it was as easy as installing the piece of software via the ports and running with it. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: 127 Halcyon Road, Marenia, Atlantis |
posted 09-24-2002 05:40
*ahem* don't forget about the Quake Server!! |