Topic awaiting preservation: something I've been working on |
|
---|---|
Author | Thread |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: beyond the gray sky |
posted 09-25-2004 11:49
link - filesize : 46k, resolution : 1024x768 |
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: Beyond that line... |
posted 09-25-2004 18:17
SWEEEEEEET!!! |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: raht cheah |
posted 09-25-2004 18:39
thats MC Escher, and his work as well. Are the frightened people your creation or are they copy and pasted as well? |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Dublin, Ireland |
posted 09-25-2004 23:45
Weak. |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: under the bed |
posted 09-26-2004 04:40
I have to echo JK and Hugh here... |
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist From: Massachusetts, USA |
posted 09-28-2004 21:12
This just has me baffled. I don't see it saying that it's your own work, so I don't know whether you were trying to take credit for the Escher woodcut or not, but even as a composition of a bunch of cut and pasted imagery, it's just... I'm sorry, it's terrible. You can see a swatch of color through the cropped Escher bit, suggesting that you accidentally erased there, or when you were cropping it, you missed a spot. The lamp (I think) hanging down is blurred beyond recognition, and it's not even fully in the composition, that's just messy. The only thing that it looks like you had any involvement in creating is the "frame" of the painting, and again, the edges of the painting are so blurred, it doesn't look so much set in the frame as just ... I can't even describe what it looks like. It looks like nothing. It looks like just a terrible cut and paste job. Beyond the gradiant and possibly the frame of the painting, I see nothing that I would attribute to your own hand. If you made the frame and were showing it off by cutting and pasting some other artwork in, well, that'd be at least a little understandable... except you have made it so the frame is barely visible. |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: beyond the gray sky |
posted 09-29-2004 05:14 |