Topic awaiting preservation: Rebels in Iraq?

Rebels 'execute' 49 Iraqi troops

Wow.

I thought there were just "terrorists" in Iraq...since when did the term "Rebel" come up? Does anyone have any reliable information on this new turn of events (if real)?

Rebels? Now that is a chilling term, indeed.

Just depends on how the writer wants to spin and how they want their readers to see the people commiting such acts. Rebels, insurgents, I don't think so. Rebels do not execute people and insurgents do not decaptiate hostages.

Perhaps it was a translation error, perhaps not. In the end, a rose by any other name is still a rose.

edit: some other sources here

Ramasax

(Edited by Ramasax on 10-25-2004 01:47)

Ram, are you really so stupid?

If the Media changes its "description" of what is happening in Iraq, that can represent a shift in attitudes. It can also change perceptions. Waging war on Terrorists is one thing, but against Rebels? Insurgents?

quote:

---

Rebels do not execute people and insurgents do not decaptiate hostages.

---

Says who? You? That is hardly a reliable source. You need to re-examine your history.

Anyone else?

Defining Terrorism: Is One Man?s Terrorist Another Man?s Freedom Fighter? by Boaz Ganor, ICT Executive Director, International Policy Institute for Counter-Terrorism.

_____________
Disclaimer. All opinions by metahuman use objectively defined terms. Use Princeton University's WordNet if you are uncertain of the actual meaning. Have a nice day!

An interesting article. Thank you for posting it.