Topic awaiting preservation: Googlewhacking (Page 1 of 1)

Iwas just wondering, who here has tried the sport of Google Whacking? The idea very simple. It is to perform a normal Google search on any two words and come up with just one result. It sounds pointless at first (actually now I come to think of it, it still is pointless) but I find it strangely addictive. I found "pterodactyl hydrogeologist" and "paraphilia misting" yesterday. Today my friend to whom I introduced it found "quintuplicated bureaucracy".
Post your Whacks you find, and any opinions you have on this strange, but addictive sport.

Hehe, great fun
I don't have that much time, but I got the followin (worked off one of yours for the first )

pterodactyl venomously
alacrity intravenously

My Website (finally! And yes, it uses frames and is evil, but, well, take a look, it's not as evil as you might think )

What a "Whack Job", I've tried a bunch of Google Whacks from the official Google Whacking site and they all came up with many results!

Antidisestablishmentarianism Hyperpolysyllabicsesquipedalianist

sumbiatch sasquatch

smega flapper
odiferous fornicator
assjack monkeynuts
candypants punkybrewster
behemoth saltynuts

:::11oh1:::

(Edited by krets on 01-20-2005 06:57)

This guy took it to the next level

Read about it here

interactive thingamajigie

Although the spelling is a bit off...hehe. Does that still count?

Apparantly, for purist google whacking, it must come up with a match on dictionary.com (noted by a link on the results page) - I found several others, albeit the two I listed were the only two "pure" ones

Wrayal

My Website (finally! And yes, it uses frames and is evil, but, well, take a look, it's not as evil as you might think )

I have to say when I posted this I expected to see lots of comments like "what the hell's the point of that?". I'm pleased they're not.

"sumbiatch sasquatch" is loosely translated Chageen for "what the hell's the point of that?" actually.

Purist shmurist!

(Damn it, that returns three results. Bastards.)

:::11oh1:::

AlterEgo, points are only required in the "Philosophy and other silliness" forum, and even there lots of people forget to include one.



(Edited by silence on 01-20-2005 22:58)

.

What the hell's the point of that?

So my kretsminky spudinky does not count because it did not return any results? I suppose it would be an engineered Googlewhack if after posting this I get the one entry I was looking for.

:::tao::: ::cell::

Hah! Found one!

verisimilitudinous parenthesis

It is, alas, not a valid Googlewhack because of the nature of resulting site.

*ADDENDUM* However, the following is valid (I'm easily pleased):

verisimilitudinous coexisting

(Edited by White Hawk on 01-21-2005 01:46)

Screw your guyses long smart people words...

"gorilla torture"





:: WWW || Contact || Deviations || ThoughtPrism ::

Ah, terribly sorry. You can't use quotes; it's against the rules as it makes it too easy. :P

Well, atleast I tried... Back to it then. =)



:: WWW || Contact || Deviations || ThoughtPrism ::

quote:

---

Karl said:

What a "Whack Job", I've tried a bunch of Google Whacks from the official Google Whacking site and they all came up with many results!

---

Well the ones on the main page of the GoogleWhack site are about three years old. And all the ones you post there are checked. So they must have been valid at the time.
And BTW, couldn't you create a site with two words on it just so that Google would find one result for those two words - the page you created? Kinda be cheating though.