Topic: I only update the site, but I didn't create it Pages that link to <a href="https://ozoneasylum.com/backlink?for=27248" title="Pages that link to Topic: I only update the site, but I didn&amp;#039;t create it" rel="nofollow" >Topic: I only update the site, but I didn&#039;t create it\

 
Author Thread
Patrick
Bipolar (III) Inmate

From: Austin, TX
Insane since: Dec 2001

IP logged posted posted 01-03-2006 22:48 Edit Quote

http://www.sweenyhospital.org



As I said before, I update it, but I didn't create it. Any and all criticism is welcomed. I am seriously considering taking the time to site and completely redesign the site from the base up, and trying to convince the person in charge of the site (my mother) to use my version instead.

---
By reading this you have just spent a second of your time

reisio
Paranoid (IV) Inmate

From: Florida
Insane since: Mar 2005

IP logged posted posted 01-04-2006 00:28 Edit Quote

http://validator.w3.org/

DL-44
Lunatic (VI) Inmate

From: under the bed
Insane since: Feb 2000

IP logged posted posted 01-04-2006 05:54 Edit Quote

Short on time, but wanted to drop a couple quick thoughts -

1) right off the bat, all I can think is.... ugh, this is *ugly*. There is nothing wrong with the general choice of layout and general color. But the specific tones chosen, the complete lack of attention to typographical issues, white space, cohesive coloring and containment is really killing this site.
And it is a damn shame that a site for an organization like this is so lacking and uninviting.

2) there is a severe lack of cohesive navigation. I shudder to think of needing to make use of this site. the mix of links that are internal and external, the complete lack of heirarchal organization - I don't know where to look for what, and every where I look there are links of seemingly different categories that make my eyes jiggle.

3) the code
that's all I can say about that...

This site is in desperate need of a major structural, organizational, and stylistic overhaul - and the quicker the better.

Patrick
Bipolar (III) Inmate

From: Austin, TX
Insane since: Dec 2001

IP logged posted posted 01-10-2006 11:17 Edit Quote

The first time i looked at the code for this site, I thought to myself, "They paid for this?" I am starting to get back into the webiste creation arena, mainly trying to stick to my CSS/HTML mix sites that I've done in the past. I hope to have somekind of new site in a few weeks, but it make take alittle longer, gotta pry myself away from WoW (My main is almost to 60).

Thanks for the input, now to find emp...

---
By reading this you have just spent a second of your time

templar654
Paranoid (IV) Inmate

From: below the Eternal Potty Trainer!
Insane since: Apr 2004

IP logged posted posted 01-16-2006 09:56 Edit Quote

Which year was this site made in?

Patrick
Bipolar (III) Inmate

From: Austin, TX
Insane since: Dec 2001

IP logged posted posted 03-26-2006 10:02 Edit Quote

This site was created in 2004. I have been explained to after much complaining on my part that the hospital paid for the art, not the code. Still, I am working on a redesign of the site and should have the first version up in about 2-3 weeks. I am not only doing this site but also working on my on personal site. My inspiration is the CSS Zen Garden. While i use the garden as inspriration I am in no way using anything from that site. I feel dirty just thinking of lifting code from someone else, even if i did acknowledge them as the creator.

I am still hoping to hear from emp on this, but i know he is a busy man.

---
By reading this you have just spent a second of your time

DL-44
Lunatic (VI) Inmate

From: under the bed
Insane since: Feb 2000

IP logged posted posted 03-26-2006 14:20 Edit Quote
quote:

Patrick said:

the hospital paid for the art, not the code.


I don't know what that means...?

If they paid for a website, they paid for....a website. That means graphics, code, layout, and everything else that comes with it. As for the 'art' that they paid for...?: I don't see much in the way of graphics - a logo that I am guessing already existed, a couple of grey gradients, and a badly done photo collage.

If they're happy with what they got, that's up to them, but if someone actually sold them on the concept that as a web designer they provided only the 'art', then they were swindled.

FWIW.



(Edited by DL-44 on 03-26-2006 14:24)



Post Reply
 
Your User Name:
Your Password:
Login Options:
 
Your Text:
Loading...
Options:


« BackwardsOnwards »

Show Forum Drop Down Menu