(un)Intelligent Design. — OZONE Asylum, home of the Mad Scientists

This page's ID: 28922

Edit Post

Who can edit a post?	The poster and administrators may edit a post. The poster can only edit it for a short while after the initial post.

Your User Name:
Your Password:
Login Options:	Remember Me On This Computer

Your Text: Insert Slimies » Insert UBB Code » Close Last Tag \| All Tags UBB Help	[quote] [b]WebShaman said:[/b] ID simply fails to meet criteria to be a scientific theory. Until it gets to that stage, it is not worth considering as such, or in competition with such. [/quote] And that is really all there is to it... If you really do not understand why ID fails on every level scientifically, and need to know the details, the reading materials are out there in abundance, and the discussions of the details have been had here in abundance as well. If you're just playing devil's advocate...well, again we've been through it all before... As for ID being "fresher"....it really isn't that either. It is simply a couple of new phrases tacked onto biblicial creationism (again, this is established fact, not merely my opinion...) {{edit - meant to add that the "new" parts that make it ID are not new either, as it is jsut the old [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watchmaker_analogy]Watchmaker[/url] [url=http://www.update.uu.se/~fbendz/nogod/watchmak.htm]Argument[/url] [small](Edited by [url=http://www.ozoneasylum.com/user/163]DL-44[/url] on 11-29-2007 17:23)[/small] Loading...
Options:	Enable Slimies Enable Linkwords

Edit Post