(un)Intelligent Design. — OZONE Asylum, home of the Mad Scientists

This page's ID: 28922

Edit Post

Who can edit a post?	The poster and administrators may edit a post. The poster can only edit it for a short while after the initial post.

Your User Name:
Your Password:
Login Options:	Remember Me On This Computer

Your Text: Insert Slimies » Insert UBB Code » Close Last Tag \| All Tags UBB Help	I think you've highlighted a common problem, DL. It seems all too easy to confuse the evidence of a common ancestor with the mistaken notion that man evolved directly from apes, but whether common ancestry can be proved beyond a doubt isn't really the point anyway. That evolution occurs is an observable fact. Genetic commonalities are a fact. Where the confusion begins (for some) is the point at which science becomes theory. That we have a common ancestor is theory based upon observable facts and empirical evidence; it is scientific [i]theory[/i]. Creationism is a theory ([small]as is FSM[/small]) but it simply isn't [i]scientific[/i]. This is the crux of the debate for me, and everything else is hot air. [small](Edited by [url=http://www.ozoneasylum.com/user/4663]White Hawk[/url] on 12-07-2007 20:16)[/small] Loading...
Options:	Enable Slimies Enable Linkwords

Edit Post