Topic: <br> in IE and FF |
|
---|---|
Author | Thread |
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: Europe |
posted 10-29-2008 01:29
Hello everybody, code: <a style='padding: 0px 0px 0px 400px; font-size: 271px; background-image: url(http://i376.photobucket.com/albums/oo204/ZINcorp/logo.jpg); text-decoration: none; text-align: center; font-family: Helvetica, Arial;' rel="nofollow" href="www.sinfest.com"><br /></a>
|
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Norway |
posted 10-29-2008 05:02
what the heck is this font-size:271px; ? why not setting the line-height or a vertical padding instead ? And of course inline style is sub optimal, and the <br> are unnecessary. |
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: Europe |
posted 10-29-2008 08:44
Hello poi, |
Obsessive-Compulsive (I) Inmate From: Nashik |
posted 11-19-2008 11:36
Hello, |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Norway |
posted 11-19-2008 11:49 |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Florida |
posted 11-19-2008 21:37
quote: I prefer floating the li's, and leaving the markup readable: code: <ul> <li>pi</li> <li>pa</li> <li>po</li> </ul> |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Norway |
posted 11-19-2008 22:15 |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Florida |
posted 11-20-2008 01:45
Or a bipedal elephant made out of 1x1 pixel spans, huzzah! |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Norway |
posted 11-20-2008 09:05
yup. The empty text nodes will mostly likely add a vertical gap if you don't float the SPANs. |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: London |
posted 11-20-2008 11:29 |
Obsessive-Compulsive (I) Inmate From: phils |
posted 01-19-2009 10:33
I greatly favor the line-height for css |
Maniac (V) Mad Librarian From: Seoul, Korea |
posted 01-21-2009 01:59
I greatly favor spam. It is tasty. |
Obsessive-Compulsive (I) Inmate From: |
posted 10-18-2010 14:00
Nice walk through DarkGarden. Adding noise was a great insight, I'd missed that step in my thoughts on how the technique would go. I also thought that running the wind filter in the opposite direction would smudge the effects from the first pass of wind ~couldn't resist~ |