Topic awaiting preservation: zeldman made us do it (Page 1 of 1) $Pages that link to <a href="https://ozoneasylum.com/backlink?for=6818" title="Pages that link to Topic awaiting preservation: zeldman made us do it (Page 1 of 1)" rel="nofollow" >Topic awaiting preservation: zeldman made us do it <span class="small">(Page 1 of 1)</span>\$

mas Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: the space between us Insane since: Sep 2002	posted 08-30-2003 11:49 anyone seen whats on zeldman today? i think he finally did it: a better validation service with better explanations what an error means. i think this is a great oppurtunity for newbees to the web, so that they can learn easier and faster what they made wrong. read: -the daily report -the announcement of the w3c check: -the new validator
Moon Shadow Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Rouen, France Insane since: Jan 2003	posted 08-30-2003 13:18 Good news Unfortunately, my website is entirely valid, I can't see the new error messages
CRO8 Bipolar (III) Inmate From: New York City Insane since: Jul 2000	posted 08-30-2003 13:19 cool.
Bugimus Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: New California Insane since: Mar 2000	posted 08-30-2003 14:03 bugimus.com is Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict!!! woohoo! . . : slicePuzzle
Emperor Maniac (V) Mad Scientist with Finglongers From: Cell 53, East Wing Insane since: Jul 2001	posted 08-30-2003 18:40 Superb ___________________ Emps FAQs: Emperor
ozphactor Maniac (V) Inmate From: California Insane since: Jul 2003	posted 08-30-2003 21:40 Yes, this has been in order for some time now. The "fussy parsing mode" should be useful for many people. Now, if they could update the CSS validator too...
cj69collins Nervous Wreck (II) Inmate From: Allentown, PA, USA Insane since: Jul 2003	posted 08-30-2003 22:59 Well, is this not special
Dracusis Maniac (V) Inmate From: Brisbane, Australia Insane since: Apr 2001	posted 09-01-2003 04:54 And yet on your blog you claim your website is valid XHTML. I think the only special thing there is the person pounding away at the keyboard.
DL-44 Maniac (V) Inmate From: under the bed Insane since: Feb 2000	posted 09-01-2003 21:21 uh......special? that you have coded your site poorly? sure, why not....
krets Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist From: KC, KS Insane since: Nov 2002	posted 09-02-2003 01:42 Well at least since it's not valid he can't stick those ugly buttons all over the place. :::11oh1:::
DL-44 Maniac (V) Inmate From: under the bed Insane since: Feb 2000	posted 09-02-2003 03:30 he already did - even though it's not valid =)
Fig Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist From: Houston, TX, USA Insane since: Apr 2000	posted 09-02-2003 19:09 my stuff is nowhere close, which isn't surprising as its nothing i've ever worked on much before. things brings a question tho, how much should i worry about this sort of thing?i'm not a developer, i'm not a programmer, and while i understand the importance of compatibility and standards this isn't the sort of thing i want to spend my time doing, i'm much more concerned on the visual aspect and communication of what i'm designing. thoughts? chris KAIROSinteractive
jdauie Bipolar (III) Inmate From: Missoula, MT Insane since: Jan 2003	posted 09-02-2003 19:45 Fig: Focusing on standards increases the ability for you to implement your "visual aspect and communication", because it makes things the same for everyone (hopefully). As mas mentioned, it is good for beginners especially to learn this stuff.

Topic awaiting preservation: zeldman made us do it (Page 1 of 1) $Pages that link to <a href="https://ozoneasylum.com/backlink?for=6818" title="Pages that link to Topic awaiting preservation: zeldman made us do it (Page 1 of 1)" rel="nofollow" >Topic awaiting preservation: zeldman made us do it <span class="small">(Page 1 of 1)</span>\$

mas
Paranoid (IV) Inmate

From: the space between us
Insane since: Sep 2002

posted 08-30-2003 11:49

anyone seen whats on zeldman today? i think he finally did it: a better validation service with better explanations what an error means. i think this is a great oppurtunity for newbees to the web, so that they can learn easier and faster what they made wrong.
read:
-the daily report
-the announcement of the w3c
check:
-the new validator

Moon Shadow
Paranoid (IV) Inmate

From: Rouen, France
Insane since: Jan 2003

posted 08-30-2003 13:18

Good news

Unfortunately, my website is entirely valid, I can't see the new error messages

CRO8
Bipolar (III) Inmate

From: New York City
Insane since: Jul 2000

posted 08-30-2003 13:19

cool.

Bugimus
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist

From: New California
Insane since: Mar 2000

posted 08-30-2003 14:03

bugimus.com is Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict!!! woohoo!

. . : slicePuzzle

Emperor
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist with Finglongers

From: Cell 53, East Wing
Insane since: Jul 2001

posted 08-30-2003 18:40

Superb

___________________
Emps

FAQs: Emperor

ozphactor
Maniac (V) Inmate

From: California
Insane since: Jul 2003

posted 08-30-2003 21:40

Yes, this has been in order for some time now. The "fussy parsing mode" should be useful for many people.

Now, if they could update the CSS validator too...

cj69collins
Nervous Wreck (II) Inmate

From: Allentown, PA, USA
Insane since: Jul 2003

posted 08-30-2003 22:59

Well, is this not special

Dracusis
Maniac (V) Inmate

From: Brisbane, Australia
Insane since: Apr 2001

posted 09-01-2003 04:54

And yet on your blog you claim your website is valid XHTML. I think the only special thing there is the person pounding away at the keyboard.

DL-44
Maniac (V) Inmate

From: under the bed
Insane since: Feb 2000

posted 09-01-2003 21:21

uh......special?

that you have coded your site poorly?

sure, why not....

krets
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist

From: KC, KS
Insane since: Nov 2002

posted 09-02-2003 01:42

Well at least since it's not valid he can't stick those ugly buttons all over the place.

:::11oh1:::

DL-44
Maniac (V) Inmate

From: under the bed
Insane since: Feb 2000

posted 09-02-2003 03:30

he already did - even though it's not valid =)

Fig
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist

From: Houston, TX, USA
Insane since: Apr 2000

posted 09-02-2003 19:09

my stuff is nowhere close, which isn't surprising as its nothing i've ever worked on much before.

things brings a question tho, how much should i worry about this sort of thing?i'm not a developer, i'm not a programmer, and while i understand the importance of compatibility and standards this isn't the sort of thing i want to spend my time doing, i'm much more concerned on the visual aspect and communication of what i'm designing. thoughts?

chris

KAIROSinteractive

jdauie
Bipolar (III) Inmate

From: Missoula, MT
Insane since: Jan 2003

posted 09-02-2003 19:45

Fig: Focusing on standards increases the ability for you to implement your "visual aspect and communication", because it makes things the same for everyone (hopefully). As mas mentioned, it is good for beginners especially to learn this stuff.