Topic awaiting preservation: Decimal to trinary conversion (Page 1 of 1) |
|
---|---|
Maniac (V) Inmate From: Charles River |
posted 10-13-2003 06:19
Yes, you read it right. |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: Charles River |
posted 10-13-2003 07:37
Forget it. code: public static void f(String[] color, int depth, String p)
|
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist From: Somewhere over the rainbow |
posted 10-13-2003 08:20
The poster has demanded we remove all his contributions, less he takes legal action. |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: Charles River |
posted 10-13-2003 08:35
That would have been easier to code |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: From:From: |
posted 10-13-2003 14:53
What's all this Base 3 and Base 10 stuff about? If it's algebraic math, don't bother explaining. |
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist From: Somewhere over the rainbow |
posted 10-13-2003 15:00
The poster has demanded we remove all his contributions, less he takes legal action. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: |
posted 10-13-2003 15:25
my bad nothing to add |
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist From: Somewhere over the rainbow |
posted 10-13-2003 15:35
The poster has demanded we remove all his contributions, less he takes legal action. |
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist From: Somewhere over the rainbow |
posted 10-13-2003 15:59
The poster has demanded we remove all his contributions, less he takes legal action. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: |
posted 10-13-2003 16:35
Damn you, InI. After some thought, I felt that this isn't the time or place for it. |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Madison, Indiana, USA |
posted 10-13-2003 18:08
Actually there were computers designed to run on trinary circuits in the late 1940s and early 1950s. Engineers like the system because you could create circuits based on +V, 0, -V. It actually made storage of values more efficient than binary. |