Topic awaiting preservation: Font preview |
|
---|---|
Author | Thread |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: The Dark Side of the Moon |
posted 12-09-2003 18:54
OK, so I have a buttload of fonts and I am sick and tired of cycling though them one at a time in PS to see if it will match my design. Memorizing them all is out of the question because 1) My mind is already crammed with enough useless information and 2) There are to damn many to make it a possibility. |
Nervous Wreck (II) Inmate From: Denmark |
posted 12-09-2003 19:29
There should be a score of them out there.... try AMP Font Viewer 3.50 at http://www.ampsoft.net/english/Utilities.html#FontViewer |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: the Asylum ghetto |
posted 12-09-2003 19:34
there's a spot in the :FAQ: |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: *land |
posted 12-09-2003 19:49 |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: California |
posted 12-09-2003 21:12
I believe a buttload is twice the size of a hogshead, which is equivalent to 4 rods, or 500 dollars, depending on who you ask... |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: Den Haag: The Royal Residence |
posted 12-10-2003 01:04
And of course you can go to the control panel go to the fonts map and doubleclick on the fonts you want to see. You can even print them for easy reference.... |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: out of a sleepy funk |
posted 12-10-2003 02:52
I always open MS Word and use the drop down, shows the font in it's own face and I just scroll through at a glance. |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: Seoul, Korea |
posted 12-10-2003 07:11
I've got to go with Michael on this one. I try to keep my fonts down to a memorizable load. If I find that I can't remember what a certain font looks like, then I know I have too many fonts on my system. |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: [s]underwater[/s] under-snow in Juneau |
posted 12-10-2003 07:26
Knowing that Photoshop is such a widely used product, I figured that some one must have made a solution to this problem. So I decided to google: |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: 127 Halcyon Road, Marenia, Atlantis |
posted 12-10-2003 13:48
I normally use what should now be 'the JK method'... |