![]() Preserved Topic: which editor do you recommend? (Page 1 of 2) |
|
---|---|
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: the space between us |
![]() well, i don't know if this has been asked before, but i wanna know your fav editor. i've been sticking around with Dreamweaver and i just wanted to know which other (if possible, FREE) editors there are. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist with Finglongers From: Cell 53, East Wing |
![]() I use Notepad although I also use HTML Beauty (and 1st Page). |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: :morF |
![]() HTML Beauty++ and ConTEXT for PHP |
Obsessive-Compulsive (I) Inmate From: none |
![]() If you are developing for ASP.NET, WebMatrix is good. |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Where I'm from isn't where I'm at! |
![]() I use a combination of Dreamweaver and Textpad |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Rouen, France |
![]() quote:
|
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Yes |
![]() I hate what WYSIWYG editors do to code and some text editors such as HTML Beatuy++ can do those basic functions just as fast as dreamweaver if not faster, and with infinite more control. |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: Brisbane, Australia |
![]() What You See Is NOT What You Get. Unless your using a text editor. |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Rouen, France |
![]() No, I can't agree with that. I am using Dreamweaver MX and I almost everytime have what I see. I do not only code with the graphical intertface, I use both. I am NOT an expert, I know it. But I know Dreamweaver does a really good job. I never had to complain about it. Please can you explain me why you say you don't get what you see ? |
Nervous Wreck (II) Inmate From: |
![]() Notepad fans might like to check out Metapad, it's Notepad, but with a few add-ons, like line numbers, stay-on-top option etc., |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: Switzerland |
![]() Dreamweaver for the tables and weaverslave {german/free} for the php/html |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: The Soft Cell |
![]() I put in the spade work and learned html on notepad but now I think I'm going to learn DW to make things easier and quicker. anything I don't like I can always alter manually later. These tools are here to make workflow faster so why not use them? |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: :morF |
![]() But why code badly for the sake of speed when you're just going to have to go back later and fix it, which will take longer, when you could just code properly in the first place and avoid the hassle? |
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: lala-land |
![]() From Notepad to Dreamweaver. Now I am back using Notepad and I love it because I know exactly what is what and I don't have to study the code to find my way around the mess I created. |
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist From: 8675309 |
![]() BBEdit |
Lunatic (VI) Mad Scientist From: the Psychiatric Ward |
![]() I use edit pad and Cut and Paste... the Cut and Paste technology really speeds the work up... its crazy. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: Rochester, New York, USA |
![]() emacs / XEmacs |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: *land |
![]() I use HomeSite. |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: the Asylum ghetto |
![]() i use dreamweaver and notepad. i like the colored syntax and i like how it finishes my tags. i don't use the visual part of it though, cuz it never looks like what it looks like in the browser. i use notepad to do quick changes |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: [s]underwater[/s] under-snow in Juneau |
![]() BBedit , it's everything an editor should be. Luv it!! |
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: Australia |
![]() I started with DW long long ago, but now that i know *well mostly* what im doing, i just code everything in either notepad or my favourite ---- Winsyntax ---- i find its perfect for what i need. I dont touch DW at all anymore really, the code layout is so messy. I think you are better off knowing what you are coding then you know exactly what it is going to do.. I mean if you dont know or you did it in DW and even if you do know, imaging you had to do some off site editing and all you had was notepad. You're own code would be easy to edit because you know how you did it. |
Obsessive-Compulsive (I) Inmate From: none |
![]() If you don't need WYSIWYG, then try Developers Pad. |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Greenville, SC, USA |
![]() you know, I used to be that "code till you die" type of guy until I realized: it just doesn't make sense. First off, while I'm learning a language, I'll do nothing but notepad in it for a year or so. Just so I know the code in and out and I don't become wysiwyg dependent. So I learn my craft first and I learn it well. However, I don't possibly see how hand coding can come anywhere near the speed of a wysiwyg. If you know your code and you know it well, than a wysiwyg does not compensate controll at all. Now I use Dreamweaver MX, and will never look back. I get things done at three times the speed, and I still know my document inside and out. (I'm constantly toggling both code and wysiwyg views.) I'm learning javascript and perl right now. So while I'm learning it I use notepad until I know it. And creating database driven sites is a breeze in Dreamweaver.... |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: under the bed |
![]() I use textpad also ( http://www.textpad.com ). It's *only* drawback is that it's a windows only app. |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Greenville, SC, USA |
![]() I have to completely disagree. I know alot of people (including myself) that know their code and still find dreamweaver to be a awsome and convenient tool. Know your code, but use your tools. But I'm finding it's purely preference. do you use a manual screwdriver or an electric one... |
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist From: KC, KS |
![]() I've been using EditPlus for a long time now and would be hard pressed to try anything else. It color-codes every thing I need (HTML, CSS, PHP) and if it doesn't natively support what you're trying to do you can download modules that other people have created to help color-code almost any platform. |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: the Asylum ghetto |
![]() I went to the Edit Plus site to check it out and it looked great! so I just downloaded it to give it a go. It looks nice! I haven't used it yet, but it looks easy enough. |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: under the bed |
![]() |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: AČ, MI, USA |
![]() Just whatever you do.. |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Greenville, SC, USA |
![]() I'll second that! |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: Den Haag: The Royal Residence |
![]() Until a few months i used, Max' HTML-beauty, but i just switched to Crimson editor this is a very clean editor and doesn't clutter my desktop. It also understands colorcoding for a lot of languages. Also i like to work with multiple documents. So i can see different tweaks on a page. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist with Finglongers From: Cell 53, East Wing |
![]() |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: Seoul, Korea |
![]() Heh, two of the editors listed here (Edit+ and Crimson Editor) are written by Koreans... I tell you, those crazy Korean programmers are something else. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: 127 Halcyon Road, Marenia, Atlantis |
![]() what I did (on the WinME box) was backup and overwrite the original notepad.exe, but trying to do so on my mother's WinXP proved impossible.. the original notepad wrote itself OVER my rewrite.. |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: there...no..there..... |
![]() I like to use HTML Beauty. I used to use Notepad like Emps, then switched to TextPAD. The only problem with Notpad, is that your code won't validate. Minor thing maybe, but . . . I like to make sure I can get it to standards. |
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: Berlin (almost) |
![]() It would have been much too easy to have a button there which lets you choose an editor of your choice now wouldn't it |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: Den Haag: The Royal Residence |
![]() Suho thank your country men for those programs. |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: the space between us |
![]() WOW, thanks for the input, guys |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: the space between us |
![]() hey edit plus is really cool, but where can i adjust the doctypes? |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: Seoul, Korea |
![]() kuckus: Thanks, that did the trick. |
[1] 2 — Next Page »