Closed Thread Icon

Topic awaiting preservation: Source Guardian Pro 1.7 (Page 1 of 1) Pages that link to <a href="https://ozoneasylum.com/backlink?for=12800" title="Pages that link to Topic awaiting preservation: Source Guardian Pro 1.7 (Page 1 of 1)" rel="nofollow" >Topic awaiting preservation: Source Guardian Pro 1.7 <span class="small">(Page 1 of 1)</span>\

 
tgullett
Obsessive-Compulsive (I) Inmate

From: Lexington, Kentucky, USA
Insane since: Jun 2003

posted posted 06-26-2003 22:15

Any feedback on Source Guardian Pro 1.7?

Thomas Chase Gullett
tgullett@elinkdesign.com

bitdamaged
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist

From: 100101010011 <-- right about here
Insane since: Mar 2000

posted posted 06-27-2003 17:27

Never heard of it sorry. (I just didnt' want there to be no responses on this one )



.:[ Never resist a perfect moment ]:.

tgullett
Obsessive-Compulsive (I) Inmate

From: Lexington, Kentucky, USA
Insane since: Jun 2003

posted posted 06-27-2003 21:43

Source Guardian is for encrypting and converting software.

I am using it to make sure our PHP code for a content management system that we created would be safe from prying eyes.



Thomas Chase Gullett
tgullett@elinkdesign.com

jive
Paranoid (IV) Inmate

From: Greenville, SC, USA
Insane since: Jan 2002

posted posted 06-28-2003 05:19

links? maybe? perhaps?



Tyberius Prime
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist with Finglongers

From: Germany
Insane since: Sep 2001

posted posted 06-28-2003 12:52

http://www.phpguardian.com/ , I'd guess.

As with all those tools, there's a trade off.
They prevent the casual viewing of your php code,
but they're bound to make your server slower/handle less traffic.

In addition, the decryption key's gotta be somewhere on the server.
So if one really wanted to, it could still be reversed into php code.

My personal take on this:
If you can't trust your customer, and for some reason a legal contract isn't going to cut it (say, you're doing buisness somewhere IP isn't as strong as the US and Europe),
this might be a good idea.

For everthing else, if you're paranoid?
Add a tiny 'bug' to your script that calls home every couple of days, which will tell you if it's put to run on another server.
Then, if you have a properly phrased contract and feel that there's no more buisness to do with that client, sue them.
Much more effictive than any 'encryption' (=obfuscation if the key's on the server. and it's got to be).

trib
Paranoid (IV) Inmate

From: Den Haag, Netherlands
Insane since: Sep 2002

posted posted 06-29-2003 13:04

So if I read your reply correctly, you use an open-source, free-to-use product, probably running on another open-source, free-to-use product, but you want to keep your source closed ? .... and you're asking for free advice on a possible product to help you do that ...

... and for a CMS system, which most of your customers could go out and find for free too ... what startling innovation have you included which makes it different from any of the free ones on the market (apart from a price tag that is) ...

Why not open your source?? put it on Sourceforge and bring the world's PHP community into the development process instead of excluding them, and charge a reasonable fee for support and setup consultancy instead. You'd get the best of both worlds then ... free development, and an income too.

Perfect Thunder
Paranoid (IV) Inmate

From: Milwaukee
Insane since: Oct 2001

posted posted 06-29-2003 13:47

Not much point in "stealing" code anyway, since most code isn't easily adapted to new situations. Anyone with skill can just write his own, people of moderate skill can download one of the dozens of free scripts, and people without skill wouldn't be able to make heads or tails of your code to begin with.

Cell 1250 :: alanmacdougall.com :: Illustrator tips

tgullett
Obsessive-Compulsive (I) Inmate

From: Lexington, Kentucky, USA
Insane since: Jun 2003

posted posted 07-02-2003 16:14

I am in agreement with everything. I am a full fledge open-source code developer.

We have a scenario where we have developed a site for this company that has there own web people there. There skills are very limited and the CO wanted a full blown cms to cut back on time for the people publishing news, along with them placing banners etc etc. I was afraid of them going in and tamper ring with the live version which would in turn make the software not work.

/TCG

Thomas Chase Gullett
tgullett@elinkdesign.com

Tyberius Prime
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist with Finglongers

From: Germany
Insane since: Sep 2001

posted posted 07-02-2003 20:17

well, if the server's in your range of responsibility,
I just wouldn't give them ftp access... they hardly need it for the cms.

Plus, I'd make sure I got the ftp logs of that server forwarded,
so that you can *show* their boss if it's them screwing up.

trib
Paranoid (IV) Inmate

From: Den Haag, Netherlands
Insane since: Sep 2002

posted posted 07-02-2003 20:49

The System Manager is our friend ... Just get the ownership and rights set up so the proggies can't change the webbies scripts ... i.e. make it all your ownership, and set everything 644 or 640. The only files to make 664 will then be be the config and parameter files. Saves you mioney, and puts the onus on the company to make sure it secures its assets.

Sorry I was a bit hard on you before


Bug-free software only exisits in two places
A programmer's mind and a salesman's lips

tgullett
Obsessive-Compulsive (I) Inmate

From: Lexington, Kentucky, USA
Insane since: Jun 2003

posted posted 07-02-2003 21:26

It's all good Trib. Thanks I will do that as well... Since I already spent the money.

Although it is a cool program, it might not be worth what I paid for it though.

/TCG

Thomas Chase Gullett
tgullett@elinkdesign.com

Petskull
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist

From: 127 Halcyon Road, Marenia, Atlantis
Insane since: Aug 2000

posted posted 07-03-2003 08:44

why not have your beautiful source in a read-only directory and have the app rewritten every midnight via cronjob?


Code - CGI - links - DHTML - Javascript - Perl - programming - Magic - http://www.twistedport.com
ICQ: 67751342

« BackwardsOnwards »

Show Forum Drop Down Menu