Topic: All M.Ss should go here

Yes, that's right...here http://www.geekcode.com/geek.html , and find out just how much of a geek you really are, and your classification, mine was GATd+s+:+a---C++U++++P+LEW+++NoK-wO-V-...and then it ghoers on for about another three lines. my, my, my...can't we tell I'm bored?




Don't make me come down there! - God

cool

GCM/M/MU d- s+:+ a--- C++ L P+ E? W+++ N+ o? K? w !O M-- V? PS PE Y PGP-- t+ 5++ X R tv b+++(++) DI+ D++ G e- !h !r y--

heheh, I wanna see everyone's y, or x if you swing the other way.

um...huh?

DL, X Y and Z are for the SEX cat, X is female, Y is male, and Z is for a person of undisclosed gender.

sloloem, either youve mistaken what the x, y, and z are for or you dont know what the phrase "swinging the other way" means.

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GAT d- s-:- a-- C+++ !U P L+ E? W+++>$
N? o? K w--(w++++) O? M+(M) V? PS---(PS)
PE+ Y PGP- t+(t++) 5- X- R? tv-- b+++ DI--
D---- G e h-(h+++)>--- r++ x?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

I gotta say that a TRUE geek would automate the process.

Anyway here I am in all my glory.
 
 
GB/GCA/GFA/GO/GAT> d-/d---@ s+:+ a- C++++ UL P+/P+++> L+/++> !E W+++ N+ !o K- w--- O- M+/M++> V PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP/PGP- t++ 5- X+ R+++ tv+ b++++ DI+ D++ G e++++ h--- r+++ y++/y**@
 
 
Some of that code makes me feel old for some reason tho.....
 
 
And here is my very old sig. (am I the only person who hasn't updated there .sig?)

I would not update my sig, but I'm not good enough to make something that doesn't look like a vat of feces or that I get sick of eventually...one of these days though, I'll make the perfect sig...one of these days...

Ok, so the fact that any of us actually sat and did this says far more about what kind of geeks we are than the actual code!

on that note...here goes:

GO d- s: a- C++(+++) U--- P L E? W+++>$ N- o-- K? w(+)/(--) !O@ V? PS+++(+) PE Y+ PGP t(*) !5 X+ R(++) tv(+) b++ DI++(+) D G- e h--(---) r++>+++ y++(**)

AHH!

Damnit, DL! You cut me!
Watch were you point that thing!

*walks away muttering quietly*

Here's my geek code:

. . .

Sorry, I went and looked at it and got bored and left.

imposter

I'm not an imposter... a TRUE geek wouldn't waste his time figuring out a code to label himself with. A TRUE geek would have better things to do. <img border=0 align=absmiddle src="http://www.ozones.com/forum/wink.gif">

maybe he couldnt find anyone to read him the code <img border=0 align=absmiddle src="http://www.ozones.com/forum/wink.gif">

Sheesh......why do we do this

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1
GB d++(d-) s++:++ a+ C+++ ?--- P+ L ?
W++(++) N o-- K- w O- (--)?PS+ PE Y PGP- t 5
X++++ R* tv- b+ DI++ D--- G-- e h-- r+++ y+(++)
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

<img border=0 align=absmiddle src="http://www.ozones.com/forum/smile.gif">

well HS, you obviously are not a true geek, or you would know that a true geek *NEVER* has anything better to do! <img border=0 align=absmiddle src="http://www.ozones.com/forum/wink.gif">

quote:

---

I gotta say that a TRUE geek would automate the process.

---

thats right.... and if he isent a TRUE geek then why on earth should I try to mess with his code????

ZAER

Well, I have to agree about the automation process. However, a true geek wouldn't bitch about it not being automated just to bitch about it. A true geek notices that it should be automated, and then does so. Personally, I looked at, having seen this around for years, and *thought* about automating it. But, it looked boring to me too, I've been thinking more about an automated javascript rollover code creator, same basic work involved, but a more useful result. Lemme know when one of you writes a basic form handler for writing geek codes and I'll go through it, OK? ;-)

Your pal, -doc-

I think Slo wants to know who swings both ways so he knows who to try and pick up on in the forum. j/k <img border=0 align=absmiddle src="http://www.ozones.com/forum/wink.gif">

I personally went straight to the bottom, read the sex part (y**) and then got bored...

I hate scrolling so I left almost immediately.