Topic awaiting preservation: Going to Mars? (Page 1 of 1) |
|
---|---|
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist with Finglongers From: Cell 53, East Wing |
posted 01-18-2003 14:31
Could this be it? After so long? We are actually going to make a manned mission to Mars? |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Milwaukee |
posted 01-18-2003 15:21
As a long-time science-fiction reader, particularly of 60s and 70s hard SF, I've been thoroughly conditioned to believe that space research is a driver of technology overall. A few billion dollars over the next seven years would be better spent on this than on (insert idiotic government project here -- there are tons). |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: under the bed |
posted 01-18-2003 17:35 |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: New California |
posted 01-19-2003 01:52
I too am a moonbase first advocate! Emps, it's so cool to know you favor one. Space 1999 was one of my favorite shows growing up. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist with Finglongers From: Cell 53, East Wing |
posted 01-19-2003 02:43
Bugs: Yep the moonbase (alpha) is really the way to go anything else is just an inefficient use of resources. The main cost of space travel is actually getting things out of Earth's orbit (including stuff like oxygen). Once you establish a base on the moon you can mine the moon's minerals and the deuterium which means you can extract oxygen and other important goodies and once you have setup solar panels you'll have all the pwer you need (the dueterium is also a great fuel source). So you could bring togteher parts sent from Earth with other basic materials to build probes and space ships. An electromagnetic cannon could then be used to simply launch things from there and the whole solar sytem opens up. Going straight for Mars is another flawed attempt to get a big flashy result without establishing the essential infrastructure for a permanent presence outside of earth's orbit. Its sad really - esp. as we now have a space station which could act as the jumping off connection between the Earth and a moonbase. I listened to a piece on the radio about space elevators and advances in materials and microengineering really make this a possibiity and that would be another amazing step. |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Dallas, TX |
posted 01-19-2003 05:04
"Life on Mars?" is a David Bowie song. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: From:From: |
posted 01-19-2003 10:49
Ground Control to Major Tom, |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: under the bed |
posted 01-19-2003 17:46 |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: Jacks raging bile duct.... |
posted 01-19-2003 18:22
I think all those billions could be better spent on boosting our economy right here in our own backyard...I would like to see the unemployment rate be somewhere around 1% for more than four years running... Ok so it's a pipedream... at this point so is a manned trip to Mars |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: New California |
posted 01-20-2003 00:32
Wouldn't spending money on going to Mars help to reduce unemployment? |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: Jacks raging bile duct.... |
posted 01-20-2003 04:45
I don't see how that would bring the unemployment rate nationwide (US) down around the 1% mark and keep it there...enlighten me Bugs |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: New California |
posted 01-20-2003 04:54
Well, nothing is going to bring it down permanently but pouring millions into a national effort to get to Mars will create lotsa jobs. That's all I meant. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: Jacks raging bile duct.... |
posted 01-20-2003 05:00
I can see that somewhat...on the otherhand I think war will do far more to boost our economy at present |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: New California |
posted 01-20-2003 05:05
I think we would be far better off without it, economically speaking. Rumsfeld is pushing for Hussein to opt for exile. Believe me, as much as people think America just wants to kill people because we're evil, we would very much prefer Hussein to step down without having to fire a shot. The economy is very skiddish right now because of anticipating further terrorist attacks and the prospect of war. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: From:From: |
posted 01-23-2003 12:31
I seriously doubt that Bush will settle for anything less than war. He's intent on starting one, totally oblivious to the international outrage that will spark from this. The US should have voted in Al Gore. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: New California |
posted 01-23-2003 19:48
I believe Bush has handled the war on terror far better than Gore *could* have. I don't say that to put Gore down but because I believe that was not one of his strengths. In fact, shortly after 9/11 I had heard that one of Gore's former campaign advisors stated as much, off the record, of course. |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: Washington DC |
posted 01-24-2003 21:59
Maybe the reason we don't have any bases on the moon is because the aliens use it and they don't want our presence there, that would also explain the reason why there have been no moon landings in so long. |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Dallas, TX |
posted 01-24-2003 22:57
I like this plan. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: New California |
posted 01-24-2003 23:40
Project Orion: Atomic Spaceship This is a great read if you like Science Fiction *and* Science Reality |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: Happy Hunting Grounds... |
posted 03-03-2003 08:44
Man, this article really sort of...well, got to me China to shoot for the moon . quote:
|
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: From:From: |
posted 03-03-2003 11:51
Space. That stuff in between the other stuff. These are the voyages of the space ship [insert space ship name here]. Its ongoing 2 week mission: to float about in orbit and do experiments. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: Happy Hunting Grounds... |
posted 03-03-2003 14:25
Well, that's why I hope the Chinese are serious about this...it gives the needed incentive, to actually do it. Can't let the Chinese control Space, now, can we? Or the Moon...or even Mars. |