Closed Thread Icon

Preserved Topic: 2 more up for review (Page 1 of 1) Pages that link to <a href="https://ozoneasylum.com/backlink?for=19068" title="Pages that link to Preserved Topic: 2 more up for review (Page 1 of 1)" rel="nofollow" >Preserved Topic: 2 more up for review <span class="small">(Page 1 of 1)</span>\

 
JCube
Nervous Wreck (II) Inmate

From: Canada
Insane since: Mar 2000

posted posted 04-13-2001 20:09

http://members.nbci.com/_XMCM/ntjello0/ICpro/new_page_1.htm
http://members.nbci.com/_XMCM/ntjello0/ICpro2/new_page_1.htm

Basically two versions of the same layout. Let me know what you guys think.

Also I have a question...how do you get the site to be able to detect resolution and then send the browser to separate sites optimized for different resolution/sizes?

Again, thanks in advance =)

JKMabry
Maniac (V) Inmate

From: out of a sleepy funk
Insane since: Aug 2000

posted posted 04-13-2001 23:38

does weird things to my machine. Bad bad bad. FrontPage applets? Evil.

Dracusis
Maniac (V) Inmate

From: Brisbane, Australia
Insane since: Apr 2001

posted posted 04-14-2001 00:18

I think the First one was much better, Nice use of warm colours...

Really don't like the white in the main content tables and such though. Stick with one colour for the background with a site like this. So make the Table background black, and the text light grey, white or a yelloyish orange mabey?

Also, put some space between the main content area and the Header Pic, look's bad like that.

I also think you're overusing Scan lines on you imagery. Don't get me wrond, scanlines look kinda cool, but their beginning to become more and more like lense flares. Everyone seems to use them for everything, just because they can, and this is just what it looks like. You only seemd to use this effect cause you knew how to do it??? I'm not saying get rid of all of them, just tone it down a bit. But this is only my personal opinion......

I really like the menu you've done, nice work so far.

Umm.... You're menu didn't work either, I'll assume you havent put in the other pages yet....

acidbox
Bipolar (III) Inmate

From: purgatory
Insane since: Mar 2001

posted posted 04-14-2001 01:21

(top link)

firstly, your tables don't line up when you expand the browser. Looks like you made this one for 800x600 only or something

Scondly, Frames suck. Especially 3 of them. OMG, lose the frames. Nobody cares to see the header/logo the whole time they are on your site. Not to mention the fact that if you shrink your browser, you get scroll bars all over the site.

Thirdly, your site is not organized well at all. Your main page doesn't match the rest of the site, and the thing looks like parts from 3 different websites all pasted together... It's ugly.

You have a start on the left menu. Perhaps you could modify a little easier to read/use, and then build the rest of the site around it.

(bottom link)

refer to link 1, except worse.

Just my .02 cents

twItch^
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist

From: the west wing
Insane since: Aug 2000

posted posted 04-14-2001 07:58

I'm just gonna skip what these folks have said, not because I disagree...In fact, I think I agree.

I'll preface with this : Love the design. The *design* is good. The implementation, on the other hand, absolutely blows. Hard. Super-hard.

But we can fix that.

The frames have *got* to go. The liquid design (that is non-existant as of yet) I will suggest some coding ways to fix all that hoowah.

We lose frames, we're left with tables, and css absolute positioning. Your choice. Do you want this to work in *all* browsers or do you want to make it work only in compliant or non-standard browsers?

Feel free to email me, we'll work through that.


stephen

« BackwardsOnwards »

Show Forum Drop Down Menu