![]() Preserved Topic: Improving scanned images (Page 1 of 1) |
|
---|---|
Nervous Wreck (II) Inmate From: |
![]() Hello. Something I can't figured out in PS is improving scanned images. What bugs me in this images aret he dots. How can you get rid of them and/or what would you advise to improve scanned images? |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist with Finglongers From: Cell 53, East Wing |
![]() kensai: It depends on what you are scanning from in the first place. If you are scanning from a nice glossy image then you'll get a better quality scan - that looks like you got it from ordinary (insert technical terms) and the dots are part of the original printing. If it isn't then you should be able to increase the DPI settings when you scan it in and that will give you a smoother/cleaner image (and a much larger file size). I don't see it being a PS problem uite yet - more of a problem with the scanning and/or the quality of the original. |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: a pocket dimention... |
![]() Looks like you're scanning from a screened print (i.e. a magazine, vhs cover, back of a toy box, etc.) Those dots look to be halftone screen patterns. Not much you can do about getting those to not show up in the scan, as they are actually part of the original image. The first/quickest thing you can do is try adding a slight bit of a median blur to the image (filters>noise>median). This only works well with images like that (anime'/cartoons) because they have lots of flat color to them. Adding a slight median blur will even out the colors in the halftone screen and should make them into an average color (hense the name median hehe). The amount to do it depends on the image, so I suggest just playing with settings, but when I've tried to clean up anime' pictures before, media has worked wonders for me. |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Dublin, Ireland |
![]() I do believe Moiré is the word for that effect. To fix it you could use smart blur and various other filters. |
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist From: 8675309 |
![]() If I'm not mistaken, an old trick is to scan it at a 45degree angle and then rotate the canvas in PS back to where it should be. I've heard that helps with moire. |
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: Mpls, MN |
![]() The proper angle would be 15° degs, cyan in generally the most common primary. Black 45° in most cases is so slight that the morie has little effect. But you would want to angle the scan to match most noticable primary. |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: The Land of one Headlight on. |
![]() Added to FAQ. This had been answered some time back but I couldn't find the thread so this one's here to stay. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist with Finglongers From: Cell 53, East Wing |
![]() NJ: Good idea making this a FAQ. No problem on the hiccup front |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist with Finglongers From: Cell 53, East Wing |
![]() Now for the science bit quote:
|
Lunatic (VI) Mad Scientist From: Massachusetts, USA |
![]() Yes. Actually, guys, I don't see moire here. I can see the problem that the resolution of the image isn't as high as the resolution you scanned at, but moire is caused when the two resolutions conflict and *cause a pattern*. There's no pattern here. Thankfully. This can be worked with; moire usually can't. |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: a pocket dimention... |
![]() Usually Moire refers to the funky spirograph-line pattern you get when you take a repeating pattern and scale it (there are other causes, but that's the most common one I can think of). What you're seeing in that scan is just the half tone patter itself.. the actual dots. It's not really causing so much of a moire as it's causing noise. If you can see the half tone pattern, then you are already at a higher resolution than the lpi of the original print, so you should be fine by simply median blurring the image to knock out the dots and flatten the color (in this instance). |