Preserved Topic: Need comments badly (Page 1 of 1) |
|
---|---|
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: Drammen, Norway |
posted 08-17-2000 23:30
I am working on a new website these days, and would like one or two of you to comment on it. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: Long Island, NY |
posted 08-18-2000 03:40
Looks real good Awilthil, but I would move the "HYPERMAP" over to the left. Its a little odd in the center, although still cool. Nice work. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: the west wing |
posted 08-18-2000 04:58
My only concern is that of hosting; get off geocities. You have a slick design that is horribly mangled when yahoo! puts their little logo on the top corner... it's just sad that people aren't allowed to have free web hosting without those damned things. I almost prefer tripod or one of the other pop-up places, simply because I have a pop-up killer installed. But past that, I love the design...but I wonder; do you have to give descriptions in those slick boxes at the bottom? If so, why not all of them? I say scrap them and replace it with news and headlines, etc etc. Something dynamic that will change often would do the trick. |
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: Drammen, Norway |
posted 08-18-2000 17:53
Geocities is only a temporary host for this site. I have the Hyperpark.com domain as well. I don't know what you mean when you ask if i should have text in all baxes in the bottom. There is! I am thinking of having some headlines somewere on the interface, just haven't found out where yet. I'll probably change the layout quite a lot, just need some ideas first. The important thing for me is not messing to much with the singel pixel bevels. I LOVE THOSE! |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: the west wing |
posted 08-18-2000 18:45
What I meant by the text was this: Photoshop Tips, Gallery and Portfolio all have their own little boxes at the bottom as well as links in the actual interface. I question whether or not that's necessary--"news" "free stuff" and "hyperforum" don't have slick text boxes at the bottom...just seemd unbalanced. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: Long Island, NY |
posted 08-18-2000 23:09
Awilthil: |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: Long Island, NY |
posted 08-18-2000 23:24
www.dreamshadow.net <-- Kelly's website. |
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: Drammen, Norway |
posted 08-18-2000 23:26
I was thinking... How about this. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: Long Island, NY |
posted 08-18-2000 23:28
Awilthil: See above for the link. Sounds like some good ideas. I didnt notice an about section or anything too personal. Perhaps you could use the third box for that. |
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: Drammen, Norway |
posted 08-18-2000 23:36
You answered before I even asked!!! |
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: Drammen, Norway |
posted 08-18-2000 23:44
Sorry Jestah, I now see what you mean. GREAT IDEA!! Maybe not tu user-friendly though. It is easier to use a standard scroll for most people. I did'nt see it first time. But i suppose there are ways to make the scrolling more obvious than Kelly did on her page. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: Long Island, NY |
posted 08-19-2000 01:42
Deffinatly an awesome site Kelly has there Awilthil, yeah the scroll isnt always the most practical thing to use. I know mine doesnt work in Netscape, but since Im making a new layout as we speak Im not even going to bother to correct it. I havent had a chance to view Kelly's in NN but Im sure it works in both browsers. It can be done in both browsers, however your right the standard scroll is probably a lot easy and more effecient. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: the west wing |
posted 08-19-2000 08:12
Hmm... As far as compatibility and usability of dhtml scroll bars, I say go for it--they're up in the 80%, I'd imagine, of people using browsers that are compliant. I'd be more concerned, if I were you (and if I were listening to most of the concerns voiced by folks here in the Asylum) about browser size--keep it below 800x600...I cannot remember if you did that anyway, but I thought I'd re-voice it before someone else did in a less-than-diplomatic way. |