Closed Thread Icon

Topic awaiting preservation: New camera in near future (Page 1 of 1) Pages that link to <a href="https://ozoneasylum.com/backlink?for=6536" title="Pages that link to Topic awaiting preservation: New camera in near future (Page 1 of 1)" rel="nofollow" >Topic awaiting preservation: New camera in near future <span class="small">(Page 1 of 1)</span>\

 
Indus
Bipolar (III) Inmate

From: Maine
Insane since: Aug 2002

posted posted 07-10-2003 06:40

I have decided to save for a new digi camera and I am looking for the best for the $'s. I have looked and the one that I seen to like the most is the Canon Powershot A70. It's less then $300 and has great features from the ones that I have compared.

Does anyone else have any suggestions for a camrea that is under $300??

Wolfen
Paranoid (IV) Inmate

From: Minnesota
Insane since: Jan 2001

posted posted 07-10-2003 07:47

Indus: I would suspect that camera would be a good one for a digital. Canon has always been a good name. I just recently inherited a Canon AE-1 Program that is about 20 years old but it still takes REAL sharp pictures. Non digital, but still good for a cam. Currently sells on Ebay for about $120 bucks.


The programmer's national anthem is 'AAAAAAAAHHHHHHHH''

Wolfen's Sig Site

viol
Maniac (V) Inmate

From: Charles River
Insane since: May 2002

posted posted 07-10-2003 08:17

I am thinking about buying the new Canon G5 (~ $700) because my wife already has a Canon EOS-30 (Elan7 here in the US) and I could share the flash. If it was not for this sharing, I would buy a Olympus C-5050 (~ $ 550). These are a little more expensive cameras but both have 5 mega pixels and more megapixels is a must if you intend to edit your photos.

Fig
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist

From: Houston, TX, USA
Insane since: Apr 2000

posted posted 07-10-2003 16:34

i've been doing some window shopping myself and the a70 is my pick too, i've read nothing but rave reviews. its also tough to find manual features in a camera in that range, a definite winner.

as far as "more megapixels" imo a 3mp camera is really more than enough for most purposes that i've found. that gives you like 2000 x 1500 res, or somewhere in that ballpark, which is pretty solid for most applications you'd need it for.

chris


KAIROSinteractive

Tyberius Prime
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist with Finglongers

From: Germany
Insane since: Sep 2001

posted posted 07-10-2003 20:29

moving this to the photography section...

« BackwardsOnwards »

Show Forum Drop Down Menu