Topic: I'm going to shoot myself.... (Page 1 of 1) Pages that link to <a href="https://ozoneasylum.com/backlink?for=9688" title="Pages that link to Topic: I&amp;#039;m going to shoot myself.... (Page 1 of 1)" rel="nofollow" >Topic: I&#039;m going to shoot myself.... <span class="small">(Page 1 of 1)</span>\

 
krets
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist

From: KC, KS
Insane since: Nov 2002

posted posted 10-03-2003 20:42

I've been working on a project for my boss recently and just had a vicious blow struck. The systems this project is going to run on are still running IE 4.0.

Ouch. Mind you, I didn't find this out until I was almost completely done with the project and had used lots of CSS-2 and other spiffy things that absolutely will not work in IE 4.0.

So here're my questions:

Do external stylesheets work in IE 4.0 or does it all need to be internal?
What CSS will work and what won't? Anyone have a good resource on this?
Do you know anyone with a large sharp knife that I can ram into my skull?

:::11oh1:::

ozphactor
Maniac (V) Inmate

From: California
Insane since: Jul 2003

posted posted 10-03-2003 21:33

Actually, it's not as bad as you would expect. IE4 was actually ahead of its time, when it came to CSS support. External stylesheets are certainly supported, and IE4 even understands the @import rule (although there is a way to make it not).

As for CSS layouts, could you show us the page you're working with? From my experience, IE4 botches floated layouts, because ot has an incorrect "float model." Absolute positioning works relatively well, and I'm not too sure about the rest.



twItch^
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist

From: the west wing
Insane since: Aug 2000

posted posted 10-14-2003 01:07

Oh, buddy.

Yes, I know what does and does not work.

-S

DL-44
Maniac (V) Inmate

From: under the bed
Insane since: Feb 2000

posted posted 10-14-2003 01:44

I agree, it's not quite as bad as you might think. It was *far* better than NN4.x on CSS support.

Floats, as Oz said, will crumble into an incoherent mess, but a lot of "normal" visual styling will work out ok.



Petskull
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist

From: 127 Halcyon Road, Marenia, Atlantis
Insane since: Aug 2000

posted posted 10-14-2003 18:55

wow.... you've got balls...

I probably would've scampered back to table structures with my tail between my legs.....


Code - CGI - links - DHTML - Javascript - Perl - programming - Magic - http://www.twistedport.com
ICQ: 67751342

Sash
Paranoid (IV) Inmate

From: Canada, Toronto
Insane since: May 2000

posted posted 10-15-2003 05:25

How (un)realistic is the idea of trying to convince your boss to upgrade?

Sasha »

Petskull
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist

From: 127 Halcyon Road, Marenia, Atlantis
Insane since: Aug 2000

posted posted 10-16-2003 03:01

damn good point, Sash..


Code - CGI - links - DHTML - Javascript - Perl - programming - Magic - http://www.twistedport.com
ICQ: 67751342

poi
Paranoid (IV) Inmate

From: France
Insane since: Jun 2002

posted posted 10-16-2003 03:17

twItch^: Thank you for the compatibility table.
Sash: In my ex-company, that was the commercial team who told the clients their site with lots of DHTML and complex style will work like a charm in 4th generation browsers. Damn, those guys didn't even know what a <table> is. The cherry on the cake was that we had one computer with IE3 and NN3 ( for the clients coming from the twilight zone ) but none with IE4

Mathieu "POÏ" HENRI

[This message has been edited by poi (edited 10-16-2003).]

Skaarjj
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist

From: :morF
Insane since: May 2000

posted posted 10-16-2003 03:51

*Clears throat...looks about nervously*

"We interrupt this thread to bring you the following announcement"

HAPPY P3K Petskull!



Post Reply
 
Your User Name:
Your Password:
Login Options:
 
Your Text:
Loading...
Options:


« BackwardsOnwards »

Show Forum Drop Down Menu