Preserved Topic: bill |
|
---|---|
Author | Thread |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: The Land of one Headlight on. |
posted 06-29-2001 08:05
bill wins |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: under the bed |
posted 06-29-2001 19:20
oh |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: Den Haag: The Royal Residence |
posted 06-29-2001 19:39
??? |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: 100101010011 <-- right about here |
posted 06-29-2001 19:49
bill didn't win anything. |
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist From: 8675309 |
posted 06-29-2001 20:08
Oh, that Bill. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: Belgrade, Serbia |
posted 06-29-2001 20:12 |
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist From: 8675309 |
posted 06-29-2001 20:14
That he is. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: the west wing |
posted 06-29-2001 22:09
I dunno... |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Minneapolis, MN, USA |
posted 06-29-2001 23:11
It's not the fact that it's on every computer. It's the fact that MS stifles innovation through unfair market practices. If they would just steal the good ideas and make it work, that wouldn't even be so bad. It's when they use their market power to prevent other companies from supporting a superior product that is particularly annoying. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: the west wing |
posted 06-29-2001 23:40
Let's not get into a conversation about shifty American business practices. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: Belgrade, Serbia |
posted 06-30-2001 07:05
I was also extremely against company separation. And I'm glad that it won't happen. But, isn't that funny that people are still trying to "destroy" Microsoft and everything what they do. Now, the enemies started to complain about instant messaging. Who cares if MS would be shipping MSN Messenger with Windows XP (it is already included with Windows ME, and you don't have to install it if you don't want to). No one is obligated to use it, and you're not forced to open an account with that IM system if you don't want to. But, no, AOL (ICQ & AIM) felt threatened and they started to attack Microsoft, again... |