Preserved Topic: That's so "gay"... (Page 1 of 1) |
|
---|---|
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: The Attic |
posted 06-20-2001 15:34
Alright, something you will encounter probably in the majority of the internet forums is the expression "gay" used as a negative term, e.g. "that's gay", "you're gay" and similar expressions. Now - why exactly is it that this word has degenerated in such a fashion? |
Neurotic (0) Inmate Newly admitted |
posted 06-20-2001 15:50
What I find even more interesting is that you make this post.... yet you feel the need to say "I'm not homosexual...". |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: the west wing |
posted 06-20-2001 16:15
Now, I'm not straight, but I feel I should comment on this thread anyway... |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: :morF |
posted 06-20-2001 16:16
Oooohhhh...I had a good experience today. The former Arch-Bishop of the Arch Diocease of Melbourne was bening interviewed on the radio, the government station run by the ABC, 774 3LO on the AM band. I was at that time being given a tour of the ABC studios, and I happened to go past the 3LO studio as the interview was being conducted. The first words I heard out of his mouth were 'All Homosexuals are sick and depraved, and this is a disease on society that we must cure though the use of tough, head on campaigns, like those currently being used on drugs'. This guy is a complete fuckhead, I hate him, he is so blindly prejudiced. Anyhoo, after going on like this for 15 mins, the interviewer tunred all of his arguments back on him, and made him look like the dickhead he is. He eventually said 'I don't have to sit here and take this...this interview is over', turned off his mike and stormed out, accompanied my the mocking laughter of me and the rest of the group I was with. We then saw him later, and laughed again, then later again, and still we laughed...ahh the fun of it. |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: Brisbane, Australia |
posted 06-20-2001 18:58
Arr crap... I type out several pages and it get's eaten by yet another random browser error anyhow, in a very small nutshell. |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: under the bed |
posted 06-20-2001 19:32
"gaily forward" |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: New California |
posted 06-20-2001 20:27
There are still people who can't stand the fact that gay no longer means "happy". Language evolves, it's not a problem, deal with it. |
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: The Attic |
posted 06-21-2001 00:14
Taxon, I wanted to clarify it, not because I would see a bad thing in being homosexual - in fact, a good buddy of mine is homosexual. And I hug him, I go out with him, I party with him. Where's the point in discriminating people because of their sexual preference? |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: under the bed |
posted 06-21-2001 00:54
I just have to add....... |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: A little lower... lower... ahhhhhh, thats the spot |
posted 06-21-2001 00:55 |
Lunatic (VI) Mad Scientist From: Massachusetts, USA |
posted 06-21-2001 02:30
People who use "gay" like that are all a bunch of slime-balls. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: New California |
posted 06-21-2001 02:39
Personally, I can't stand fags and would never put one in my mouth. My dad did that for years and it wasn't pretty. |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: soon to be "the land down under" |
posted 06-21-2001 03:59
Ah, Bugimus seems to know that the original meaning of the word "faggot" was a burning piece of wood or more likely, a cigarette. I have no idea how this changed into the way it is used today. Really quite interesting. |
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: Houston, Texas USA |
posted 06-21-2001 07:29
I thought I would jump in on this. I hear kids...and some ppl who are not kids refer to things as, "gay." Most of the time I just ignore it...but sometimes I dont think I should have to. I am a gay male. I know it is me and my lifestyle that ppl are using as a casual slur. I have asked ppl why they say this. They always say its not said as something bad...Or they just say, "no offense" But it is offensive. Along with this you would actually be surprised how much heterophobia is going on in the gay community. I have even been known to refer to ppl as, "damn breeders" |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: Happy Hunting Grounds... |
posted 06-21-2001 11:57
Is it really important to talk about 'labels'? Don't really like reducing PEOPLE to labels...I mean, we are all different, one way or another. Now, don't get me wrong, I 'know' how it is in reality, but really...I think people use 'labels' to somehow reduce these 'differences' to discuss 'those people are different, so that makes me uncomfortable' sort of thing. What I really dislike, are people who say 'my best friend is..., so I understand.' As part native american indian, I first learned about my people in school through the lens of the white man's history, it wasn't until much later that I learned the other sides of my people's history. And because I am a half-breed (another icky 'label'), I had the feeling of being both conquerer and conquered. I like the word people. Just people, no more, no less. Unfortunately, we are still using languages where gender is an issue, as well. Would love to have a word like 'hisser' or 'hermer' for his/her. As to sexual situated, I don't really care, as long as the people in question are consenting adults. What they do is their own affair. Don't agree with bugs, however (one of the seldom times I've disagreed with bugs) that it should be private. That just fuels such labels on, IMHO. At least when it's out in the open, people can't deny it, have to deal with it. And knowing is the first step to understanding, which can then lead to acceptance. Not that it always does. In my travels around the world, I was (and still am) confronted with new ideas, customs, etc, that bring my american upbringing into conflict. I would like to think that has influenced me to be more accepting of what is different. Just my thoughts... |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: under the bed |
posted 06-21-2001 13:21
mm, are we to go to a 'don't ask don't tell' policy? |
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: Houston, Texas USA |
posted 06-21-2001 13:23
I just wanted to add on to my last post. What Bugs said about our sexuality being a private thing. If I were to keep it private I would not be able to speak of my partner. I would not be able to tell the ppl I work with the wonderful things I do on my days off with the person I love. I would still have to listen to them tell me about their husbands and wives. My partner is no less important to me than your wife. I have just as much right to talk about him and post pictures of him on my desk. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: Happy Hunting Grounds... |
posted 06-21-2001 14:11
Hmmm...I think maybe that come over wrong. I prefer the word people to 'labels'. And if someone really read my thread (like DL) then it's clear that I recognize that people are all different. I just don't support hammering the differences into 'labels'. Because then we are not really recognizing the differences, we are just being discriminatory. However, that probably also has something to do with the limitations of language. Just as was commented on by flik, some people don't really understand the connotations behind the 'label'. So maybe they don't really mean to be discriminatory (or even aware of it). That's food for thought...gotta think about it for awhile. |
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: |
posted 06-21-2001 14:38
Hey DL, |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: under the bed |
posted 06-21-2001 17:51
yup - pretty much what timothy said.....and class as it existed 200 years ago doesn't really exist now.......it's not as predefined amd rigid........I'm using the term loosely...... |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: the west wing |
posted 06-21-2001 17:54
heh |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: under the bed |
posted 06-21-2001 20:27
....that's so gay |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: New California |
posted 06-21-2001 21:47
So what is the current slang term in the gay community that describes a gay that acts stereotypically gay? I mean there is "Rock Hudson" gay, "Liberace" gay, etc. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: the west wing |
posted 06-21-2001 23:45
Flamers & queens are the ones that lisp, repeatedly break their wrists, and wear tight clothes. That's very important. |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: soon to be "the land down under" |
posted 06-22-2001 01:10
And queens are not necessarily gay. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: New California |
posted 06-22-2001 01:36
Have any of you heard of male lesbians? |
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: Houston, Texas USA |
posted 06-22-2001 01:49
I was sitting here trying to think of something witty and yet profound to say on this subject. And I decided that I coudlnt do it. damn. |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: Brisbane, Australia |
posted 06-22-2001 09:39
Eh.. Nuf said... |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: Happy Hunting Grounds... |
posted 06-25-2001 08:54
Well, Bugs, I'm Cherokee. Not officially recognized by the tribe, my grandfather did something to piss them off, don't know what, and my family was 'erased' from the tribal histories. My father is a drug addict, don't know much about him, don't know if he's still alive. Spend some time on the reservation, but because of my 'white' looks, was never really accepted. So do I know what it means to be discriminated against? Yes, and that from both sides. Not that I bitch and moan about it. It's just the way it is. I would suppose that many people are in the same situation as I am, one way or another. Just seems that there is not much that one hears about it. On the totem pole of racial discrimination, indians are sort of the 'forgotten' minority, I guess. So go figure. |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: Brisbane, Australia |
posted 06-25-2001 11:44
he he he... |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: under the bed |
posted 06-25-2001 12:18
I was gonna say that 'being goth' was far different from the other things being discussed here, but then I realized that being goth *is* a form of mental retardation.......so I guess it does fall under the same category.... |