Jump to bottom

Closed Thread Icon

Preserved Topic: Anyone love Conundrums like I do? (Page 6 of 6) Pages that link to <a href="https://ozoneasylum.com/backlink?for=20772" title="Pages that link to Preserved Topic: Anyone love Conundrums like I do? (Page 6 of 6)" rel="nofollow" >Preserved Topic: Anyone love Conundrums like I do? <span class="small">(Page 6 of 6)</span>\

 
Morph
Paranoid (IV) Inmate

From: The Soft Cell
Insane since: Nov 2001

posted posted 01-30-2002 11:02

hmmm, sounds plausable, Grumble but didn't someone say A intended to shoot B in the leg? the only reason I can think of for this is when A collapsed and grabbed his gun he shot B from under the desk and could only see his legs

~We're not here for long, we're here for fun~

GRUMBLE
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist

From: Omicron Persei 8
Insane since: Oct 2000

posted posted 01-30-2002 11:23

yes and by the shot C would be warned that something evil is going on.

bugs, if A wouldnt have got the heart attack, C would have been killed
by B?
by A?
by A and B?

Bugimus
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist

From: New California
Insane since: Mar 2000

posted posted 01-30-2002 16:28

Money or taking jewelry had nothing to do the solution.

A intentionally shot B in the leg. He could have killed him if he wanted but chose only to injure him.

"if A wouldnt have got the heart attack, C would have been killed" Incorrect. If A did not have the heart attack, C would NOT have been killed. As it happens even with the heart attack C was saved by A's actions.

GRUMBLE
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist

From: Omicron Persei 8
Insane since: Oct 2000

posted posted 01-30-2002 17:25

bugs you are confusing me. is there even a sensefull explanaition for that situation.
but on the other hand im so crazy about this, that i cant wait to hear it!

Bugimus
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist

From: New California
Insane since: Mar 2000

posted posted 01-30-2002 17:58

The solution is not only sensible but it is completely plausible. This is my all time favorite conundrum precisely because I remember what it was like the first time I tried to solve it with some friends several years ago.

The key to solving this is to find out *exactly* what the two psychiatrists were arguing about. Remember they were having a gentlemanly debate about a hypothetical situation that is related to their field of expertise.

Hint: They decided to settle their debate once and for all.

Emperor
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist with Finglongers

From: Cell 53, East Wing
Insane since: Jul 2001

posted posted 01-30-2002 18:31

They aren't hypnotherapists debating whether you could hypnotise someone to kill someone else are they? A hypnotises B who goes off to murder C causing A to have a heart attack but he gets a gun and shoots B breaking B out of their hypnotic state.

I think I may have A and B mixed up but something like that? Perhaps B also hypnotised A to have the heart attack in a hypnotherapist's stare down!!

My best shot.

[edit: badly worded!!]

[edit: Swapped A and B around]

Emps

[This message has been edited by Emperor (edited 01-30-2002).]

Morph
Paranoid (IV) Inmate

From: The Soft Cell
Insane since: Nov 2001

posted posted 01-30-2002 20:30

Damn it Emps, thats too good. if thats not the answer then it deserves to be

<edit> btw, does anyone have a record on what the all time biggest posting was?

~We're not here for long, we're here for fun~

[This message has been edited by Morph (edited 01-30-2002).]

BeeKay
Bipolar (III) Inmate

From: North Carolina mountains
Insane since: Dec 2000

posted posted 01-30-2002 21:26

My money is on Emp getting it right! Dadgumit!

bunchapixels
Neurotic (0) Inmate
Newly admitted
posted posted 01-30-2002 23:43

WOO-HOO!
over 200 posts!

___________________
b u n c h a p i x e l s

eyezaer
Lunatic (VI) Mad Scientist

From: the Psychiatric Ward
Insane since: Sep 2000

posted posted 01-31-2002 00:23

to deviate even more... how long does it take to load this thread on a 56k?

Bugimus
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist

From: New California
Insane since: Mar 2000

posted posted 01-31-2002 01:15

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

F I N A L L Y ! ! ! Emps that's it!!! Yeaaaahhhhh!!!

A and B were disagreeing on whether a hypnotized person would actually carry through with a murder. They decided to conduct an experiment where A would hypnotize B to go and murder C. Of course, A would be right there to snap B out of the hypnosis as soon as it became clear he was going to do the deed. But just as B turns to go attack C, A begins to suffer a fatal heart attack and realizes the only way to save his wife and not kill his friend is to shoot him in the leg.

That was fun


bunchapixels
Neurotic (0) Inmate
Newly admitted
posted posted 01-31-2002 01:51

well done emps, and i know declare this thread - dead.

---so, DOES anyone love conundrums? i never found out.---

___________________
b u n c h a p i x e l s

« Previous Page1 2 3 4 5 [6]

« BackwardsOnwards »

Show Forum Drop Down Menu